It is highly advisable to focus on asset protection and estate planning at the same time. Keep in mind, however, that you will likely need separate documents for each type of planning.

Most people who set up an asset protection trust (“APT”) — either domestic or foreign — usually want to (i) retain some sort of control over the trust assets and/or (ii) continue to benefit from the assets held in the trust. They also generally want to decide what happens to the assets upon their death. This generally means that assets held in your APT will be included in your estate for federal estate tax purposes. In more technical terms, contributions to an APT will be an incomplete gift; and the trust settlor will likely hold a testamentary power of appointment over the assets.

This post is simply a reminder that focusing on asset protection and estate planning at the same time is highly advisable. But you need to keep in mind that each type of planning will likely require separate documentation.

About 16 states now have laws that allow a Domestic Asset Protection Trust (DAPT). These trusts can be very useful to protect assets in many situations.

But keep in mind that a DAPT (like other asset protection strategies) is designed to protect your assets and keep you out of bankruptcy. It may be less useful if you actually file for bankruptcy.

§548(e) of the Bankruptcy Code gives a bankruptcy trustee the right to challenge a conveyance made to a DAPT within ten years of the time it is made. That is a long time. Outside of bankruptcy, a creditor would likely have nowhere near that amount of time to challenge a conveyance as being fraudulent. Moreover, a bankruptcy trustee may have a lot more power and resources to challenge alleged fraudulent conveyances than many creditors would.

So this is just a reminder that a DAPT may be significantly more vulnerable to an attack by a bankruptcy trustee than by a creditor outside of a bankruptcy situation. This is also a reminder to document transfers to a DAPT (with evidence of your solvency at time of transfer) in case the transfer is later attacked as being "fraudulent".

Much of my work is centered on helping clients protect their assets during their lifetimes.  But most people also want to make sure that their assets are protected after their deaths.

A recent article in the New York Times describes a very public fight among relatives of actor/comedian Robin Williams.  His widow and his children from prior marriages are fighting over money and personal belongings.  Mr. Williams obviously could afford excellent attorneys, and his estate planning documents may have been very well prepared.  Even so, you can never underestimate the possibility of family members disagreeing about things after your death.

This is simply a reminder that even with the help of excellent attorneys, devising and implementing an effective estate plan is still a challenge.  It is clearly worth the time and effort.  It is a blessing to surviving family members when things are spelled out as thoroughly as possible.  This not only helps family harmony (by avoiding unnecessary arguments), but can also save a lot of family money. 

Careful estate planning should be part of your asset protection planning.

Many people assume it is relatively easy to correct an error in their credit report.  That is simply not the case.  In one of my recent blog posts I explain that debtors often face an uphill battle when they try to remedy a creditor mistake.

Now a new FTC report says that about one in four consumers who disputed information in their credit reports ultimately just give up trying to correct the report. 

A recent article by Sheryl Harris in the Cleveland Plain Dealer contains helpful information about how to check the accuracy of your credit report.  If you find an error, you should definitely try to get it corrected.  Just be aware this may take more effort than you would expect.

An amazing article on the front page of today’s New York Times reports that nursing homes in New York are increasingly seeking guardianship over certain residents simply to gain control of their finances.  The author, Nina Bernstein, acknowledges that in some instances, a nursing home might seek guardianship because there is no relative capable of helping the patient.  But in many cases, nursing homes are simply using the guardianship process as a collection tool!

Even if a family member wins the guardianship fight, that family member may have to pay thousands of dollars (or even tens of thousands of dollars) in legal fees.  So at a minimum, a nursing home can use the guardianship process as leverage to get a contested bill paid.  A number of judges in New York seem to be going along with these guardianship petitions.

There are several asset protection lessons here.  First, having your estate planning documents in order – – including a health care power of attorney and a financial power of attorney – – is important from an asset protection as well as a personal standpoint.  Second, this is a reminder about how far creditors might go in trying to collect debts.  So getting an asset protection plan in place before you have any creditor issues could save you (and your family) a lot of money.  It also could save family members a lot of needless anxiety. 

Articles that seemingly have nothing to do with asset protection might still provide valuable asset protection reminders.  A recent article by Teresa Dixon Murray in the Cleveland Plain Dealer is a good example.  The article discusses an individual who keeps more than $100,000 hidden at home! 

That reminds me of at least two asset protection considerations.  First of all, hiding assets is rarely an effective asset protection plan.  You could hide cash at home, but homeowners insurance generally covers only about $200 in cash in the event of a fire or robbery.  So while hiding cash may seem like a good idea, it probably is not for many reasons — including the fact that is uninsured.

The article also reminds me that most of us rarely conduct a periodic view of all of our life, auto, casualty and other insurance policies.  That periodic review could be worthwhile because it may identify significant assets that are not properly insured.

There are many asset protection strategies that are worth considering.  Some of them can be fairly complex.  An offshore trust arrangement, domestic asset protection trust or one or more LLCs could be a reasonable choice for certain individuals in certain circumstances.  But as I have mentioned many times before, you should not overlook the most basic forms of asset protection.  And one of those items is insurance.  It is a very worthwhile exercise to periodically review your biggest risks and ask whether they are (or could be) insured.

Anyone who is deeply in debt knows the terrible stress and fear that often results from being in that situation.  So it is no surprise that many debtors are easily victimized by phony collection agencies. 

A recent article by Sheryl Harris in the Cleveland Plain Dealer highlights a scam by a Georgia collection agency that took millions of dollars from consumers in all 50 states.  Many victims were payday loan debtors who are often most vulnerable to this type of scam. 

The FBI reported that callers routinely pretended to be FBI agents, U.S. marshalls, sheriffs or Justice Department employees.  Callers frightened people into paying them by telling them that warrants were out for their arrest—or even that officers were on the way to arrest them.  The Georgia company employing these tactics now has criminal charges pending against it. 

This is another reminder to be wary of any debt collector who is threatening or who makes unreasonable demands.  While many of these victims are low income individuals, it is important to remember that middle class and even very affluent individuals can unexpectedly find themselves in debt and the target of debt collectors.  Protecting your assets to the greatest extent allowed by applicable law is more important these days than it has ever been before.

In Ohio (as in other states that have enacted a Domestic Asset Protection Trust Statute), it may be advisable to have two or more trusts as part of an overall asset protection plan.

For example, a husband and wife may each want to have their own, separate Ohio Legacy Trust.  Not only can this help to keep certain assets separate, but the respective trusts can then co-own other assets — like interests in an LLC.  In many states, a multi-member LLC provides better protection than a single member LLC. 

Keep in mind that this kind of planning — like all asset protection planning — requires careful attention to a wide variety of factors, including tax considerations.  Many variables often need to be considered before deciding on a particular plan. 

In any event, using more than one DAPT (just like using more than one LLC or other business entity) may be advisable in many situations.

An interesting article by Cindy Krischer Goodman in the Miami Herald provides some excellent examples of how fortunes today can change in an instant — due to social media.  For example, racist comments in a private phone conversation between the Los Angeles Clippers’ then owner, Donald Sterling, and his girlfriend went viral and literally cost him ownership of an NBA team.  Private behavior can become almost instantly public through social media – and can result in almost instant financial disaster.

Certain exposure on social media is certainly not bad.  I am simply offering a reminder that in today’s world, your fortunes can turn almost instantly.  And protecting your assets before some unexpected disaster strikes is more important than ever.

Clients frequently ask about potential income tax aspects of an Ohio Legacy Trust. 

An Ohio Legacy Trust will likely have no effect at all on your income tax situation.  The trust will be structured so that it is a grantor trust pursuant to §677 of the Internal Revenue Code.  It meets the requirements of this Code section because trust income may be distributed to the Grantor without the approval of any adverse party.  In less technical terms — any income from the trust will simply be reported on your personal income tax return. 

An Ohio Legacy Trust can also hold S Corporation stock because it is a grantor trust.  There are certain limitations on what kind of entity can be an S Corporation shareholder.  A grantor trust is one of the entities that can own S Corporation stock.

There are many considerations that go into setting up an Ohio Legacy Trust (or a domestic asset protection trust in any other state that allows one).  But as long as the trust is properly drafted, you should not have to worry about its impact on your personal income tax situation.