In a post on February 8, 2012 I referred to an excellent article by Pauline W. Chen, M.D. She described how involvement in a medical malpractice action can negatively impact a physican’s way of practicing medicine.
Dr. Chen recently published another article in the New York Times that is also noteworthy. She explains how a medical malpractice

An $8.5 million jury verdict seems high, doesn’t it? But if you consider that the injured party was an infant who suffered brain damage (and will require lifelong care), then the amount of damages could be perfectly reasonable.
Being named as a defendant in a medical malpractice case can be emotionally devastating to a physician — even if the physician is only peripherally involved in the case. Very few people fully appreciate how troubling it can be for a doctor who is named in such a lawsuit.
A couple weeks ago I posted some general observations about asset protection planning for physicians. While a doctor should be taking steps to protect his or her own personal assets, physicians in a private medical practice should be taking additional steps to protect the private practice itself. Here are some items worth thinking about:
Physicians should have no hesitation whatsoever in protecting their assets to the greatest extent allowed by applicable laws. Physicians have a greater need for asset protection planning than many other individuals simply because of the nature of their work.