In April of 2018, the Georgia legislature presented to Governor Nathan Deal HB 441 for signature, which permitted the use of DAPTs in Georgia. The statute contained many of the similar flavors of other DAPT statutes, with a few notable exceptions like allowing tort creditors to reach assets in the DAPT. A few days after being presented with HB 441, Governor Deal vetoed the bill.
Continue Reading 2018 Year-End Review: Part Four: Georgia Vetoes DAPT legislation
Kyle T. Mordew
2018 Year-End Review: Part Three: Embassy Healthcare v. Bell
Our last case law discussion comes to us from the Ohio Supreme Court in Embassy Healthcare v. Bell. This case provides a great illustration of facts that many may one day encounter: a nursing home sought payment from a surviving spouse of a decedent spouse’s outstanding bill. But where this case is particularly interesting is the method by which the nursing home sought payment.
Continue Reading 2018 Year-End Review: Part Three: Embassy Healthcare v. Bell
2018 Year-End Review: Part Two: Toni 1 v. Wacker
Our second decision comes from the Supreme Court of Alaska. This decision is a core illustration of the potential problems with establishing a domestic asset protection trust (DAPT) for a resident of a state that does not allow DAPTs.
Continue Reading 2018 Year-End Review: Part Two: Toni 1 v. Wacker
2018 Year-End Review: Part One: In re Olson
Part One: In re Olson
Part one of our 2018 asset protection year-end review begins with the case of In re Olson. This case is yet another reminder that it is critically important to engage in asset protection planning before you have a creditor problem.
The decision comes to us from a U.S. District Bankruptcy Court in California. Olson was married to a NASA engineer who formed a startup company that sought to specialize in surveying for oil using an airplane and other specialized technology. The startup received hundreds of millions of dollars in investor capital, but when the price of oil collapsed, so too did the company. As a result of the collapse, Olson was served with a lawsuit from a creditor. After being served, she transferred $4.6 million in assets into a Cook Islands trust.Continue Reading 2018 Year-End Review: Part One: In re Olson
2018 Year-End Review
2018 saw a number of interesting cases and developments in asset protection law. I would like to discuss and summarize many of these key developments in a 2018 asset protection law year-end review. To prevent posting one very lengthy and detailed post, I will break the series into four parts. Parts 1-3 will summarize and…